<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Monday, August 28, 2023

Redistricting Heat Tests Judges; Legal Climax Nears With Five Dems And One R Key Players; GOP Gains In Initial Test But Final Ruling Could Favor Dems  

Judge Van Soleyn
It's not easy being a judge in the battle over New Mexico redistricting. 

There are five Democratic state Supreme Court justices--some with decided progressive leanings--keeping watch as the Republican lawsuit alleging the three congressional districts were gerrymandered nears trial. 

And you have a conservative GOP rural district court judge presiding over that three day bench trial set to begin Sept. 27 and with his decision deadline from the Supremes now October 6. 

All the judicial players are expected to keep their emotions and political views to themselves as the heated arguments pour forth. It may be asking too much but that's the system here. First there is the partisan scuffling in the Legislature to come up with the new districts then the inevitable legal wrangling.

Would an independent redistricting commission doing the task instead of the Legislature, as some have suggested, make a difference? Maybe, but we aren't about to find out since redistricting is done only once a decade with the next one scheduled for 2031 after the 2030 census. 

With Judge Fred Van Soleyn of Clovis praising the GOP argument for erasing the new districts and the Supreme Court agreeing to have him move the case forward to trial, there has been speculation that the high court--which will receive the appeal that will result from whatever Soleyn decides--might be prone to go along with a decision that tears up the new congressional districts that are now occupied by three Democrats.

Don't say fat chance, but slim to none might be proper. National independent experts argue that the new districts still keeps open a chance of Republican victories in the three seats. The most compelling chance of victory is in the southern congressional district where former US Rep. Yvette Herrell is challenging Dem Rep. Gabe Vasquez who won the seat from her in the new district in 2022.

Chief Justice Bacon
Bolstering the argument that the Republican vote is not being diluted in the southern 2nd CD is the rankings by the professional pundits--including the Cook Political Report--that the Vasquez-Herrell rematch is one of the few true toss-up seats in the US House in 2024. How can that be if the seat was gerrymandered to shut out the Republicans? 

The first and Third Districts are more solidly Democratic. The fact that no major Republicans have yet emerged to run for those seats next year speaks to that. 

In the end it is not partisanship that has isolated the New Mexican Republicans. It is the desertion from their party over a decade and the flight of new voters to the Democrats. The GOP numbers are so diminished that they control no major statewide offices, none of the five seats in the state's congressional delegation, neither chamber of the Legislature, no seats on the aforementioned state supreme court and no GOP presidential candidate has carried the state since 2004. 

The US Senate seats, the presidential election and the statewide offices can't be gerrymandered. If the Republicans have voting strength that needs to be more fully accounted for in the redistricting, there is no evidence of it in any recent election. They have simply been outvoted and have lost their standing in the state. The famous political cliche that "elections have consequences" is why the GOP has been cornered not because of a partisan gerrymander. 

It would be nice and maybe even better for the state if there were a Republican or two to balance out the current Democratic dominance. But that's a right to be earned by a political party--not a privilege to be handed out in a lawsuit fight. 

(The preceding were political arguments in favor of the current lines, not necessarily legal ones.)

JUDGING THE BLOG

When we say Judge Van Soleyn is a conservative R we know what we speak of. He was appointed to the bench in 2013 by Republican Gov Susana Martinez. Before that he served as a Republican member of the Clovis city commission. In between he was an avid reader of our blog who sometimes offered reactions to  the news of the day:

For example, In July of 2009 he wrote to us:

When you say tax increases are off limits, but advocate for repealing tax cuts and tax breaks, it needs to be said that repealing a tax cut IS a tax increase, and repealing a tax break IS a tax increase. To argue otherwise is pure sophistry. And while I'm at it: don't spin the arguments for the tax increasers, let them do it on their own.

And in June of 2007 Van Soleyn wrote:

Joe, it's getting harder and harder to take you seriously. Despite your over-the-top salivating at having someone take on (GOP Senator) Pete Domenici, you can't be serious in thinking that this newcomer Don Wiviott will have a chance against Pete. I know you really want someone to give him a run for the money, but this guy has no chance at all. He will be mincemeat by the end of the campaign (if he stays in that long). 

It turned out that neither Wiviott or Domenici were successful in 2008. Domenici ended up stunning the state by announcing he would not seek another term. Wiviott dropped out of the Dem US Senate primary when Tom Udall got in and then ran for the northern congressional seat. Udall ultimately took Domenici's Senate slot and Ben Ray Lujan won the northern US House seat. 

MIXED REVIEWS

NM Congressional Districts
In 2020 the state evaluation of Judge Van Soleyn by the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission (JPEC) found him somewhat wanting:

Judge Van Soelen’s survey results were somewhat mixed. Among attorneys, he received positive ratings for being attentive to the proceedings, maintaining proper control over the proceedings, conducting himself in a manner free from impropriety, and for ensuring his personal staff is professional, productive and knowledgeable. His ratings were somewhat lower in finding facts and interpreting the law without regard to possible public criticism, being knowledgeable regarding substantive law and the rules of procedure and evidence, and exercising sound legal reasoning. It was noted by the Commission that his scores improved on every attribute since his previous interim evaluation in 2017. The court staff rated Judge Van Soelen quite positively in all areas. His highest rating was for behaving in a manner that encourages respect for the courts. The resource staff (e.g., law enforcement, probation and parole officers, interpreters, etc.) gave him generally positive scores in all areas. During the interview, Judge Van Soelen acknowledged that he needs to continue his work to improve his performance in certain areas.

The commission did recommend that Van Soleyn be retained by Curry and Roosevelt county voters for a six year term and he was.

THE ARGUMENT 

Here is a key passage of the ruling by Judge Van Soleyn that sent the GOP lawsuit to trial:

Plaintiffs complaint makes a strong, well-developed case that Senate Bill 1 is a partisan gerrymander created in an attempt to dilute Republican votes in Congressional races in New Mexico. They make a strong, well-developed case that Senate Bill 1 does not follow traditional districting principles, including a lack of compactness, lack of preservation of communities of interest, and failure to take into consideration political and geographic boundaries.

This is the home of New Mexico politics.

E-mail your news and comments. (newsguy@yahoo.com)

Interested in reaching New Mexico's most informed audience? Advertise here.  

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2023

 
website design by limwebdesign