Heather
Can Heather Wilson dodge another bullet? Republicans see a glimmer of hope, but Democrats are naysaying speculation that no member of the U.S. House will come forward as required to file an official complaint against the ABQ GOP congresswoman with the ethics committee and launch an investigation into her role in the U.S. attorney scandal.

"There are a couple of hundred Democrats and I am sure you will get one to do what has to be done," said a Democratic veteran.

Probably so, but no one has yet. We know for sure it won't be House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer who told the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call that he believes Wilson's actions need to be investigated, but he won't be the one asking.

"I think the House ought to take it under consideration. Am I going to file a complaint? The answer is no. It has been my consistent position that the ethics committee has a responsibility...when issues are raised in the public sphere...I would hope they would do that.' Hoyer said.

The Los Angeles Times is reporting that Heather shouldn't start breathing easier. "Congressional sources say that fellow lawmakers may file a complaint with the House Ethics Committee." Reports the paper.

Unlike Senator Domenici, Heather says she has yet to hire a lawyer to handle any case that results from the charges leveled by former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias who told Congress this week that both of the prominent Republicans tried to get him to speed up indictments in the investigation of the construction of the ABQ Metro Court and other projects. But she could easily be getting some free legal advice. Her husband, Jay Hone, is an an attorney.

PETE AND THE PRESS HEAT

Senator Domenici, long a favorite of the ABQ Journal, did not get a break this week when the state's largest newspaper editorialized that there should be an independent counsel hired to investigate ethics charges against Pete and Heather or probes by the congressional ethics committees. The Journal, however, was cordial compared to the editorial page of the New York Times (registration) which Friday scorched New Mexico's senior senator.

"Americans often suspect that their political leaders are arrogant and out of touch. But even then it is nearly impossible to fathom what self-delusion could have convinced Senator Pete Domenici of New Mexico that he had a right to call a federal prosecutor at home and question him about a politically sensitive investigation." Opined the Times.

THE BOTTOM LINES

ABQ City Hall insiders say the head of the city's cultural services department, Velia Silva, has resigned after some behind-the-scenes the controversy. Silva served as field director for Mayor Chavez's '05 re-elect. Look for more on that story in the days ahead...Thanks to my readers for all their emails and encouragement this week which helped us cover the Iglesias story...And a tip of the blog hat to photog Mark Bralley for his extra efforts in keeping us supplied with some cool photos. Have news or a comment? Email it in from the link at the top of the page.

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

Sen. Domenici
More shock waves buffeted our Enchanted Land Wednesday as stunned observers tried to absorb the news that New Mexico political icon Pete Domenici has been forced to hire a criminal defense lawyer to defend himself before his colleagues in the U.S. attorney scandal.

One Republican, slack jawed in disbelief that the legendary Senator Domenici had been forced so far on the defensive, declared: "Pete hiring a criminal lawyer is like putting graffiti on the Washington Monument."

But as soon as the news was digested, criticism poured forth over Domenici's choice of lawyers. Lee Blalack is the same attorney who defended disgraced Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham who was convicted of bribery and other charges and is now serving eight years behind bars. Domenici was immediately subjected to a berating for his hire by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee where the juices are already flowing over the possibility that Domenici could be subjected to a competitive race next year, or in their wildest dreams, forced to retire early.

Domenici hired his attorney Febraury 28, just prior to bombshells being dropped by then-U.S. Attorney David Iglesias. Now that the ethics case is moving forward, Domenici can no longer hold back on a public announcement.

Domenici's lawyer has solid credentials, but his association with Cunningham was just what the senator did not need, coming as it did on the heels of sworn testimony by former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias that Domenici had crossed the ethical line and pressured him to speed up indictments in a federal investigation to benefit Domenici protégé, and ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson. Domenici is the subject of a preliminary inquiry by the Senate Ethics Committee and Wilson is expected to be subjected to the same treatment soon for her phone call to Iglesias.

There is a weird irony to Domenici hiring this particular lawyer, as was pointed out by the Washington Post: "Blalack, a partner in O'Melveny & Myers LLP's Washington office, is an experienced defense lawyer. As attorney for Cunningham, who is serving a sentence of more than eight years, Blalack dealt with one of the federal prosecutors who was later ousted, Carol S. Lam of San Diego."

SCANDAL MANAGEMENT

Domenici's scandal management has not earned high marks from the political Alligators who say his initial reaction to go into the bunker was wrong. They also faulted his weekend statement in which he said he didn't know anything about contacting Iglesias, only to admit later that he had made the October phone call. Now the tie-in to Cunningham.

"Domenici and his staff are not used to being on a war room footing. He has not had a serious challenge for thirty years and the rust is showing. Whether he will bring in some fresh faces to help out (besides the lawyer) is a question being raised," informed one Potomac Alligator.

Domenici's hasty legal hiring signaled that he was ready to fight the charges, but also meant he was not able to stop the investigation from beginning. His family and friends have to be concerned that the high-stress battle to come could take a toll on the 74 year old Domenici whose health of late has been stable, but can still be frail.

That fancy lawyer is going to cost Pete Plenty of money too. Insiders say he should be able to use his campaign funds to pay for him or start a special fund.

HEATHER IN THE HOUSE

While Pete was lawyering up, over in the House the powers-that-be were letting Heather know that the lions would soon be released on her too. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer volunteered that Wilson's alleged strong-arming of Iglesias to help out her election should be investigated. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is making her their latest poster child for Republican corruption, featuring her prominently on their Web site. However, Heather was receiving some support from House Minority Whip Roy Blunt who tried to damp down expectations for a probe, arguing Wilson did nothing wrong.

There's divergent views on what consequences Senator Domenici and Rep. Wilson could face from ethics inquires that are beginning to take shape on Capitol Hill, but one thing is certain--politics will play a crucial role in how rough things get.

There are two paths we could go down. The most punishing is described by a former top Democratic House lawyer Stanley Brand who tells the Journal and Washington Post that Wilson could conceivably be the focus of an obstruction of justice investigation by an independent counsel that could result in criminal penalties. On the other hand, another expert told U.S. News and World Report Domenici doesn't face much peril.

"I would strongly doubt that any disciplinary authority would touch this with a 10-foot pole unless you had clear evidence that he crossed the line," says Leonard Gross of the Southern Illinois University Law School. The potential violation, he said, is known as "conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice," but it's a fairly murky standard.

The truth probably lies somewhere in between, but most important for the majority Democrats is that Wilson and Domenici are tied up for months with investigations that will preoccupy them as they prepare for re-election. From a national perspective, our experts say making Domenici and Wilson national causes "keeps the momentum" going that the Dems have on the Republican corruption issue.

OTHER STUFF

For you ethics junkies, here's a complete rundown on the rules of the House and Senate that are at the center of the Domenci-Wilson-Iglesias imbroglio.

And here is an update on the overall investigation by the Senate Judiciary Committee of the entire u.s attorney scandal.

MY BOTTOM LINES

This scandal has mutated as fast as a cockroach zapped with radiation in a sci-fi movie. Last week seems months ago and an ending seems out of reach. New Mexico politics has irrevocably changed. Senator Domenici, an icon who is as much a state symbol as the Zia on the NM flag, has been brought down from the mountain. That he hired a lawyer to defend his ethics before the body he has served in longer than any other New Mexican is an emotional jolt to those of us who have been here any length of time. Generations of New Mexicans helped make Domenici into what he has become and have taken delivery of the results. It can continue. But it will never be the same. Never.

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

In riveting testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday former NM U.S. Attorney David Iglesias performed like a trick dog doing back flips as Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) led him through a series of questions that laid the groundwork for ethics investigations of GOP Senator Pete Domenici and ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson. Committee Republicans were mild in their pursuit of Iglesias, seeming to signal no strong opposition to having the Senate Ethics Committee move ahead with a probe of Domenici's actions.

(The key moments of Iglesias's testimony can be seen here.)

A House judiciary subcommittee was treated to a similar Iglesias performance Tuesday and the ethics committee in that chamber is expected to be prodded into an investigation of Wilson. Domenici and Wilson now must prepare for the prospect of being pinned down for months, dealing with what has now arguably become the most controversial episode involving the New Mexico congressional delegation in state history.

The gravity of Iglesias's statements accusing the senator and Wilson of putting undue pressure on him to speed up indictments in a corruption case involving state Democrats hit home since this was sworn testimony, not a political statement.

And Iglesias put flesh on the bones of his key intimidation accusation. He explained that Domenici called him at home, not the office, in late October 2006 asking if indictments were going to be issued soon in the courthouse construction investigation. Also adding a new dimension to the intimidation argument was the revelation that Domenici chief of staff Steve Bell--the "Shadow Senator"--first came on the line to tell Iglesias Pete wanted to speak with him.

It reminded one Alligator of that scene in Godfather II where Michael Corleone reacts to a murder attempt at his home. "In my home, where my children sleep!" Raged Michael. And Iglesias noted that he was in the bedroom of his home with his wife when the senatorial call came. The conversation ended, Iglesias said, with Domenici hanging up the phone when he was told by Iglesias that indictments would not be coming before the November election. "I felt sick afterward." Iglesias testified.

THE DOMENICI DEFENSE

Domenici argued in a statement issued after the Iglesias appearance that the former prosecutor had failed to make his case that he was being pressured.

"Mr. Iglesias confirmed that...my words did not threaten him, nor did I direct him to take any course of action...I asked Mr. Iglesias about timing of the investigation, neither I nor those who overheard my side of the brief conversation recall my mentioning the November election to him. When I was first asked, in response to a chorus of questions, about whether I pressured or threatened Mr. Iglesias, I responded that I did not know what he was talking about. Today he testified that he “felt violated.” I still do not know what he is talking about. In his own testimony, Mr. Iglesias confirmed that nothing I actually said was threatening or directive. I did not pressure him..." Domenici contended.

Who was that who overhead the conversation? Just Bell? Or was there someone else who can corroborate? The definition of being threatened or intimidated is not cut and dry either. The very act of calling him to ask about the indictments, especially at home, was enough for Iglesias. It would be interesting to know if Iglesias, at the time of the October call, knew of Domenici's ongoing effort to have Justice fire him beginning in September of '05. If he had, it would not take a hammer over his head to make Iglesias feel intimidated by the powerful senior senator. But it was the atmospherics that Iglesias pointed to as the foundation of the intimidation. The call to his home, Bell importantly announcing that the senator had complaints about him and wanted to speak with him and the abrupt hanging up of the phone by Domenici were the events that Iglesias believed amounted to undue pressure. That's plenty for the Senate Ethics Committee which has opened a "preliminary inquiry."

It's true that Domenici often hangs up the phone abruptly. How do I know? I interviewed him many times in the 70's for radio programs and he did it then. If that alone were the problem,
Pete would be off the hook. But it isn't.

On another point, the AP reported last week that it asked Domenici if he had "contacted" Iglesias after Iglesias first told the public of Domenici's October phone call. "I have no idea what he's talking about." Responded Domenici. In his statement last night, Domenici says that response was to "a chorus of questions about whether I threatened or pressured Mr. Iglesias," not whether he had contacted him.

Domenici was accused of lying when he admitted over the weekend to making the phone call to Iglesias. Critics pointed to his previous statement to the AP of "I don't know what he's talking about." Unless the AP report is erroneous, Domenici's latest statement has him applying his answer to a different question than the news agency reported it asked.

HEATHER AND THE SEALS
Rep. Wilson
There was a new twist when Iglesias discussed the call Rep. Wilson made to him October 16th, two weeks before the Domenici call. He said Heather inquired about "sealed indictments" in the courthouse case. "She had been hearing about sealed indictments. What can you tell me about sealed indictments? Red flags went up. We cannot talk about sealed indictments." Iglesias testified. He then said he told Wilson that prosecutors sometimes use sealed indictments in national security cases. "She was not happy with that answer." Iglesias told the senators.

How did Wilson learn of "sealed indictments?" Were there news reports of "sealed" indictments? Not that we are aware of. The federal grand jury proceedings are secret. Did someone in Iglesias's office tip her off? Or did Iglesias just not hear right? The courthouse indictments are expected to be announced within weeks, but earlier predictions on the timing have not been accurate. Meanwhile, the same citizens group that filed an ethics complaint against Domenici did the same with Wilson.

THE IGLESIAS PROBLEM

If Iglesias "felt sick," after that call from Domenici, why didn't he immediately call his superiors at Justice and tell them he was being strong-armed? It's a failure Iglesias has admitted to and Tuesday he said it was due to the "loyalty" he felt to Domenici who had recommended him for his job. Why didn't he report Wilson for her errant call? Because, he said, he considered her a friend. Was he more concerned with losing his job than doing his job by reporting the calls? And was he embarrassed to admit that before the nation? It's reasonable speculation. Iglesias was fired by Justice December 7, after repeated calls from Domenici that dated back to September 2005. He then turned on Domenici and Wilson with a vengeance.

PETE & THE WHITE HOUSE

The only good news for Pete and Heather Tuesday was the Scooter Libby verdict coming down during the Iglesias testimony and diverting, if only momentarily, attention from their own problems. But it didn't last long. Demonstrating how the scandal has grown from a toddler to a teenager in a matter of days, the subject of Domenici and Iglesias came up at the White House briefing. There, a spokesman was asked if the Senator had informed the White House about his desire to get rid of Iglesias. The spokesman confirmed that he had. Now the question is what reasons Pete gave the White House for wanting Iglesias out.

These and other issues provide plenty of nourishing fodder for the ethics enforcers to munch on and determine what, if any, specific House and Senate rules may have been violated. That's not good for Wilson and Domenici because it could mean ongoing news stories as the investigation progresses. They can be expected to do all they can in the coming days to have any probes conclude rapidly. But in a reversal of fortune, they no longer have power over events. The Democrats control the Congress.

BY THE WAY

Another reason was offered by the Justice department Tuesday for Iglesias getting the ax. A spokesman told the House subcommittee that Iglesias was out because "he delegated" too much responsibility to his deputy. Iglesias maintains the ax came because he refused to speed up the indictments.

THE POLITICAL LINE

On the political front, the state Democratic party released a statement focusing on Heather and Pete's insistence that it was constituent complaints that led them to contact Iglesias about the courthouse corruption case.

"Wilson’s and Domenici’s initial attempts to stonewall the media only highlighted their guilty conduct. Domenici and Wilson finally admitted in written statements that they phoned Iglesias. Although their statements seem waffling and inconsistent, both Wilson and Domenici disingenuously blame constituents for prompting them to violate congressional ethics rules." The party blasted.

Democrats weighing in on the scandal think it's pretty simple. They say Wilson panicked when she found herself down in the polls in mid-October and called Iglesias in the hope of speeding up the courthouse indictments which she believed would name several Democrats and give her re-election a badly needed boost. Wilson had made the ethics of her Democratic opponent, Patricia Madrid, a major campaign issue.

The Democrats story line has Wilson upset that her phone call did not get the expected results and that she called Domenici and Bell and asked them to call Iglesias. According to this theory, they did, and, as they say, the rest is history.

THE BOTTOM LINES

Speculation on the future of Domenici and Wilson was rampant as Iglesias named their names. I fielded calls from the Los Angeles Times (article here) and Congressional Quarterly as well as a number of my readers. As the frenzy built, the Alligators pondered all conceivable angles. Would Senator Schumer and company try some friendly but firm persuasion to convince Pete not to seek another term next year? If Pete does retire, what Democrats will emerge? Is Heather's hopes for the Senate now hopeless in light of Iglesias's sworn testimony? What about getting re-elected to the U.S. House? And will we have some polls soon showing where Pete and her stand post-scandal? KRQE-TV did an Internet poll last night that showed 67% of the respondents thought Domenici and Wilson's behavior in the Iglesias affair was inappropriate.

So it went on what was an historic day; a day in which the earth shifted under our feet and changed the assumptions under which the fine art of La Politica is practiced.

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

Former NM U.S. Attorney David Iglesias went before the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning and detailed phone calls made to him by Senator Domenici and Congresswoman Wilson, calls he said were improper. He said Domenici actually called him at home, adding to the intimidation factor. Details are here. Links to view the testimony are linked below.

HERE IS A LINK TO VIEW TODAY'S SENATE TESTIMONY OF FORMER NM U.S ATTORNEY DAVID IGLESIAS AND HERE'S ANOTHER. IT BEGINS AT 8 A.M. NEW MEXICO TIME (10 A.M. EST) HOUSE TESTIMONY IS SET FOR NOON NEW MEXICO TIME (2 P.M. EST) AND CAN BE VIEWED HERE. I WILL UPDATE DEVELOPMENTS AS THEY OCCUR TODAY.
Domenici & Wilson
Trying to pull a rabbit out of her hat on the eve of congressional testimony that could inflict severe damage on her, ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson came out from behind her stone wall Monday night, but whether she produced a rabbit or laid an egg is debatable. And whether her statement encouraged the Democratic majority in Congress to aggressively pursue ethics charges against her is the proverbial $64,000 question.

In a statement released to the Washington Post, Wilson, after days of no comment, admitted what everyone suspected--that she had indeed called U.S. attorney David Iglesias just prior to the November election to ask about a federal corruption investigation involving at least one prominent Democrat. But, she asserted:

"I did not ask about the timing of any indictments and I did not tell Mr. Iglesias what course of action I thought he should take or pressure him in any way. The conversation was brief and professional."

Wilson told the Post that she had received constituent complaints about "the slow pace of federal prosecutions in corruption cases" and that she was even told by one unidentified constituent that "Iglesias was intentionally delaying corruption investigations."

And in a statement that is sure to cause strong reaction, Wilson added: "I thought it was important for Mr. Iglesias to receive the information and, if necessary, have the opportunity to clear his name...If the purpose of my call has somehow been misperceived, I am sorry for any confusion."

Several top Dems last night immediately shot back that it is not Wilson's role to act as supervisor of the U.S. attorney, a function of the executive branch and said her version of events stretched credulity.

"Who was the unidentified constituent? Is there really one? And who were all these other folks supposedly complaining? She says she was looking out for Iglesias's own good, not looking for him to speed up indictments that would benefit her politically? This story seems far fetched, like something her opponents could have a field day with." said one Dem veteran.

BATTLE GOES TO THE HILL

Those opponents will be front and center today as Iglesias and other U.S. attorneys fired by the Bush administration go before two congressional committees--the Senate Judiciary Committee beginning at 8 a.m New Mexico time and then a House judiciary subcommittee at noon our time. Links to view the testimony are at the top of the blog.

While Wilson was trying to take air out of the Iglesias balloon, times remained tough for NM GOP Senator Pete Domenici with word coming that the Senate Ethics Committee is in receipt of a complaint from Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility alleging Domenici violated ethics rules when he made his October call to prosecutor Iglesias. Like Wilson, Domenici claims he made no attempt to speed up indictments related to corruption in building the ABQ Metro Court building and other projects. He apologized for the call, but that wasn't enough to stop the slow wheels of a senate ethics probe to start turning. In a statement that offered no encouragement to the Pete camp, Ethics Chair Barbara Boxer noted that anytime a legitimate complaint is filed against a senator it begins a preliminary inquiry and that such inquires can lead to more expansive investigations.

It's hard to believe that an ethics investigation of Wilson isn't far behind, calling into question the political futures of the state's two most prominent Republicans. Amy Walter with the Cook Political Report, summed up the situation this way for the Post.

"You're having an impact on the Senate race either way-- whether he (Domenici) stays or not."

And handicapper Walter said an inquiry into Wilson's actions could impair Wilson's "outsider" reputation. "It calls into question those skills," she said.

Here in NM, one of my Senior Alligators said if probes are launched expect them to go on for a long, long time. "Joe, it will be like Chinese water torture, with the largest drops falling on Wilson."

STARTLED DEMS

The startling turn in events has stunned NM Democrats who are beside themselves in trying to pinpoint a first-tier challenger for Wilson and also look for a suitable candidate to replace Domenici who they now see as possibly reversing his decision to seek an unprecedented seventh term.

Names were being floated by the bucketful, but none quite rose to the top-level. For example, state Treasurer James B. Lewis, a solid vote getter, but he's now in his 60's. Eric Griego, a former ABQ city councilor, energetic and informed, but seen as perhaps too far left. ABQ City Councilor Martin Heinrich, a thoughtful politico, but perhaps too liberal as well. There is yet to emerge a "jump off the page candidate" where you would say: "That person could beat Heather." Another problem is the reticence of many of the new generation of politicians; they seem risk averse, wanting a sure thing.

The recruiting crisis may solve itself if Wilson's situation in Washington continues to deteriorate; a first level candidate would likely materialize or one of the candidates already mentioned would be able to overcome a critically wounded Wilson. Meanwhile, the failure of the state Democratic party to effectively recruit candidates is coming home to roost as a challenger could already be on the field making political hay and raising money.

MORE DOMENICI NEWS

Besides Heather breaking her silence, another major development came in the Iglesias story Monday when it was revealed that Senator Domenici had been making phone calls to Justice as far back as September 2005 urging that Iglesias be booted out. His office said it was concern about such issues as immigration and the border and Iglesias's poor prosecutorial record that prompted the action.

Defenders of the senator seized on the Iglesias record, but they shot wide of the mark. In fact, federal statistics don't reflect an inability for Iglesias' office to move quickly on cases. In 2001, when Iglesias took over, the data shows a median of 4.6 months for a criminal case in the New Mexico office to move from filing to disposition (dismissal, guilty plea, or trial). In 2005, that time had dwindled to 3.7 months.

Besides, it is not the Iglesias record at issue; it is whether pressuring phone calls were made just weeks before the November election to speed up indictments that would benefit Wilson's re-election bid. The R's are on stronger ground when they fault Iglesias for failing to report the allegedly pressuring calls when they were made, not after he was fired December 7th.

Republican insiders tell me that it was actually Iglesias's investigation of voter fraud from the 2004 election and his findings that it was not widespread in New Mexico that upset some top Republicans and led to the crusade against him, not other issues. The failure to speed up the indictments, they say, was the straw that broke the camel's back and led Domenici, with the prodding of Wilson, to get Justice to finally dump him.

Both Wilson and Domenici are low on ammunition and the mood in Washington seems decidedly unfriendly. The furor over their actions is compounded because the first subpoenas the Dems have issued since taking over Congress are in connection with the dismissal of Iglesias and several other U. S attorneys. It is their first taste of red meat since taking power and it is Wilson and Domenici being served up to a ravenous press and public.

MEDIA ANGST

We're covering all the angles on this biggest of political stories, including the media angle. It was no mistake that Domenici released his version of events and an apology in an exclusive statement to the ABQ Journal late Saturday. The paper has a record of being friendly toward him. But times have changed and other media are not prone to look the other way in this Internet age. Bill Dupuy, news director of Santa Fe public radio station KSFR-FM, slammed Domenici's press office.

"Your staff has done you a disservice in the way they disclosed your statement about the Iglesias affair. They selectively released your statement first to the Albuquerque Journal, at least 12 hours in advance of releasing it to the rest of New Mexico's press and, by extension, to the rest of your constituents. That left me...and the balance of your constituents, to discover through an Internet search we had been left out. Your statement wasn't distributed to all until I personally raised the question Sunday morning." Fired off newsman Dupuy in a letter to Domenici.

It's just one example of the changed atmosphere. Pete's press office has been slow to engage critics of their boss and their boss has suffered for it. If a blog or outlet is not deemed as giving favorable coverage, they are shut out. But the blogs nationally and locally are helping to frame the coverage in other media. And that's the way it is.

THE "L" WORD

Several readers chime in that the media and blogs are ignoring Senator Domenici's initial statement on the Iglesias affair which they say catches him in a lie. When first asked about whether he called Iglesias he told the AP: "I have no idea what he's talking about."

But then over the weekend Domenici admitted calling Iglesias and apologized for the phone call. Was it a "lie?" Well, this is politics. More on this is here.

THE BOTTOM LINES

Our Monday blog said Dem Senator Jeff Bingaman and Dem Rep. Tom Udall seemed a "bit off their game" because Los Alamos Labs lost a major contract to design a new nuclear warhead and their reaction to it was muted. That drew this rebuttal from a D.C. insider:

"Udall & Bingaman have always supported the Lab, even in the wake of recent controversy. However, they have been consistent in their positions that this program may not be the best idea for the nation. In Udall's case, he wanted congressional hearings on this project because DOE's team concluded a study saying our current supply of warheads was fine. They said the life of our warheads are likely twice as long as previously . Plus, how are we going to pay for it? Wasn't this decision a little premature?"

What?? Automatic support of every Los Alamos Lab project is not imprinted on a gene implanted in every newly elected New Mexico congressional rep? I'll be...

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

Sen. Domenici
That apology by NM GOP U.S. Senator Pete Domenici was like a fig leaf that covered the most vital parts, but left plenty of skin exposed for Democratic marksmen if they choose to continue the hunt. But Domenici has acted and that's a start. Still twisting slowly in the wind is ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson who continued to stonewall reporters Friday, but will soon face the pickaxes of the majority U.S. House Democrats who will begin chipping away at both that wall and Wilson. (Iglesias is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday at 8 a.m. NM time and before a House subcommitee at noon NM time.)

The Pete apology, unprecedented in his 34 year senate career, came Sunday as former Republican U.S. Attorney David Iglesias prepared to tell the nation Tuesday that the senator and ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson pressured him in two separate October phone calls to speed up indictments in the corruption investigation of the construction of the ABQ Metro Court building and other projects; an investigation targeting former state Democratic powerhouse Manny Aragon.

Domenici's apology (his complete statement here) followed advice offered to him on your Friday blog by a senior Democratic Alligator who speculated that such an apology could call off the dogs starting to bark for an ethics probe of Domenici. He admitted to making the call and inquiring about the probe, but maintained he applied no unethical pressure on the prosecutor to come with indictments.

"The worst case scenario for Pete is senate Democrats trying to convince him to retire or face an ethics probe. If they choose not to do that, then they will be content to let Pete go and focus their wrath on Wilson who is much more vulnerable anyway. There is a big reservoir of goodwill for the senator. He has drawn down the water here, but it may be enough to get him off the hook," offered our seasoned source who first floated the apology option.

Can it be said that Domenici, 74, cut and ran when it came to Heather? They are really in separate boats as Iglesias is saying they made separate pressure-filled phone calls to him just weeks prior to Heather's re-election which nearly ended with her defeat. How could Pete have helped her? By stonewalling with her and going down for the count? Loyalty is one thing; suicide is another. One question that could be pursued is whether Domenici and Wilson communicated with each other before placing any calls to Iglesias. Meanwhile, there are already reports that a citizens group is ready to file an ethics complaint against Wilson and Domenici if Iglesias names them Tuesday.

ET TU, HEATHER?
Rep. Wilson
With Domenici out of the closet on his phone call, will we be hearing something similar from Heather? And what will Iglesias now tell Congress about those calls? He told the Washington Post he "accepted" Domenici's apology, even though it was not offered specifically to him. Will his Tuesday testimony before a House subcommittee soften Pete's involvement and harden Wilson's? After all, it was Wilson, not Domenici, seeking re-election and who would have directly benefited from courthouse indictments. That will make it all the more plausible to her congressional foes that she used a heavy hand that could be the basis for an ethics investigation, and Democrats hope, the end of her congressional tenure.

CONGRESSMAN IGLESIAS?

There was a political story line gaining traction over the weekend regarding any political ambitions of Iglesias who is not, as we blogged last week, a native of Gallup, NM, but of Panama who was raised in Gallup. We quoted the jokers last week who ribbed that perhaps he might switch from R to D and run for Wilson's seat in '08. Lo and behold, the Alligators started surfacing to tell of Iglesias actually making feelers on that front or, depending on who was doing the talking, the Dems making overtures to him.

With the state Democratic party doing such a poor job in recruiting for the congressional seats, the Iglesias speculation took on an air of believability as incredulous as it may seem on the surface. How badly Heather is damaged will determine the number of potential candidates.

WHAT ABOUT MANNY?
Aragon
And what about Manny Aragon? Once again the former state senate leader finds himself smack dab in the middle of La Politica. He is widely reported to be the target in the alleged courthouse caper. The legal beagles say Manny's lawyers have been given a gift horse and can and should argue that any indictments would be grounded in politics not the law.

There was also the race card in play, with some ABQ South Valley operatives noting that if it is finally determined that Wilson made a phone call that crossed the line it would not help her cause in some heavily Hispanic wards that still have warm feelings toward Manny. But what about Pete? "He is not the one they will be after," explained one operative who recounted how Heather tanked in the Valley last November, winning her seat by a district wide total of less than 900 votes. Domenici's seat in '08 is not yet in play by a first-tier Democrat.

Unless Wilson makes a move, we all await Tuesday and I-Day--Iglesias Day--to see if he delivers more surprises and also to assess the mood of the majority subcommittee Democrats. You don't have to be psychic to sense that we could be closer to the beginning than the end.

JOLLY STEVE PEARCE

If you're keeping score--and who isn't?--GOP southern NM Congressman Steve Pearce was the winner of the PR derby in one of the most memorable weeks in state delegation history.

While two of the three R's in the delegation were consumed with Iglesias, Dems Tom Udall and Jeff Bingaman were not scoring any points either as the latest blow to Los Alamos Labs had them looking a bit off their game.

We noted Pearce's quick statement last week denying any contact with Iglesias which kept the focus squarely on Wilson and Domenici. On Friday the conservative lawmaker struck a note of odd jocularity. He offered commentary on the brewing scandal and its entertainment value, comparing it with the Anna Nicole Smith saga. What was more striking was Pearce not offering any strong remarks in defense of his two colleagues, but then there could be a U.S. senate seat up for grabs someday soon and someone is going to have to get the Republican nomination.

Pearce has always been the media stepchild among the three GOP NM reps, but with Wilson looking very much like damaged goods and Pete disheveled as well, Pearce's stock, unlike those in the Dow Jones industrial average, was definitely on the rise last week.

THE BOTTOM LINES

ABQ Journal columnist Jim Belshaw felt this fouled-up pic from the New York Times was too good to pass up and he passed it on to us. The headline writer will definitely be put on probation for this one. The Repubs are probably saying not so fast, that's what it really looks like...We haven't intentionally neglected the 2007 NM Legislature; it's just that the compelling political stories have been elsewhere as capitol reporter Walt Rubel notes: " With apologies to NASCAR fans, covering the New Mexico Legislature is a little like watching a stock car race. For those who aren't big fans of the sport— it's pretty dull until there's a crash. And, there haven't been many yet this session — a little rubbing is all." Writes Rubel.

We still have two weeks for some pile-ups, so stay tuned.

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author

Moving to fend off calls for an ethics investigation, New Mexico GOP Senator Pete Domenici Sunday admitted he called U.S. Attorney David Iglesisas before last year's election to ask about a corruption investigation involving at least one prominent Democrat, but he denies he pressured Iglesias to speed up indictments in the case. Here are the money paragraphs in the senator's statement which you can read in its entirety at the Washington Post.

I called Mr. Iglesias late last year. My call had been preceded by months of extensive media reports about acknowledged investigations into courthouse construction, including public comments from the FBI that it had completed its work months earlier, and a growing number of inquiries from constituents. I asked Mr. Iglesias if he could tell me what was going on in that investigation and give me an idea of what timeframe we were looking at. It was a very brief conversation, which concluded when I was told that the courthouse investigation would be continuing for a lengthy period.

In retrospect, I regret making that call and I apologize. However, at no time in that conversation or any other conversation with Mr. Iglesias did I ever tell him what course of action I thought he should take on any legal matter. I have never pressured him nor threatened him in any way.

The Washington Post news story on the Domenici apology is here. And the report from the ABQ Journal is here.

Iglesias has also charged that he was called by ABQ GOP Congresswoman Heather Wilson just prior to last year's election and pressured by her to speed up the courthouse investigation indictments. Unlike Domenici, Wilson has refused comment. We'll have more on our Monday blog.

(c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2007
Not for reproduction without permission of the author